I love a good origin story. Feel free to post your own. Mine starts back in '07.
How did you become a libertarian?
This is a question that gets asked fairly often. The short answer is as follows;
I had no real interest beyond that. Mostly apathetic until moving to the other side of the world at 17 to work & live in the UK (Gap Year). There I had lots of free time to ponder what I wanted to do with my life. Part of that involved asking the big questions⌠queue: minor existential crisis. At the core of it, it was probably best described as absolutism vs. relativism, âBut what is the truth? How do I know? Is there such a thing?â. This lead to more questions. So where to begin, and who would know? The philosophers. So I started with the classics.
Platoâs - The Republic, Aristotleâs - Ethics, Machiavellâs - The Prince etc. I came away with a bit of a muddled perspective; remained a philosopher king, with a real appreciation of natural law ethics. That progressed to: âThis is all great, but what are todayâs philosophers saying?â, to âwho is todayâs greatest living intellectual?â Noam Chomsky was calling the US a world empire at the time and was a chief critic of the Iraq War invasion. He was the only one stating the obvious [that I knew of]. Naturally, I started reading his works. I even wrote him a letter seeking advice, to which he responded. Whilst killing time youtubing Chomsky videos, someone had spammed âRon Paul: Americaâs Last Hopeâ below in the comments section.. Oh yeah? I had to check him out. Several days later this âpoliticianâ hadnât appeared to ever âback downâ or âsell outâ. Unbelievable. And that was it really, I was finally on the proper path.
It wasnât so much what Ron Paul was saying, but the principled stand he was making. The anti-imperialist stuff was a no-brainer. The âextremeâ free-market stuff came later as I still had to get out of 'the boxâ. Learning basic economics helped immensely. However, that did not start until after I had stalled for maybe 6 months parroting Ron Paulâs conclusions. Finally, after not being able to adequately defend a position of his, I had to either accept or deny the objection. I needed more information and endeavoured to find out why Ron 'believesâ what he does. Austrian Economics, and Libertarianism it was. From there the immersion began into a whole new way of thinking, or â an actual â way of thinking. I then commenced with all the beginner/intro books: Bastiatâs - The Law, Enemy of the State - Albert Jay Nock, Economics in One Lesson - Henry Hazlitt etc. The results of a few book buying binges can be viewed here. Next it was downloading and listening to the entire mises.org media centre over many months.
Reading âWhat Has Government Done to Our Money?â was an early eye opener. Rothbardâs clarity and reasoning took me in. However, it was a long while before I progressed enough to feel I could adequately defend the concept of a private law, or a voluntarist society. That being said there is always room for improvement. The general joke goes, âwhatâs the difference between a minarchist and an anarcho-capitalist?â With the punchline being a certain time frame, for example âabout 12 monthsâ. It all depends on the individual, and how intense their interest. For me it was probably about 9 months of considered thought. I was sold on the rights based arguments, however the glaring question remained âbut would it work?â. The journal article âDo We Ever Really Escape From [Voluntarism]?â removed all doubt.
How did you become a libertarian?
This is a question that gets asked fairly often. The short answer is as follows;
- Intellectual honesty and the knowledge/acceptance that I was completely ignorant, combined with a strong desire for justice and an unyielding passion to find the truth.
I had no real interest beyond that. Mostly apathetic until moving to the other side of the world at 17 to work & live in the UK (Gap Year). There I had lots of free time to ponder what I wanted to do with my life. Part of that involved asking the big questions⌠queue: minor existential crisis. At the core of it, it was probably best described as absolutism vs. relativism, âBut what is the truth? How do I know? Is there such a thing?â. This lead to more questions. So where to begin, and who would know? The philosophers. So I started with the classics.
Platoâs - The Republic, Aristotleâs - Ethics, Machiavellâs - The Prince etc. I came away with a bit of a muddled perspective; remained a philosopher king, with a real appreciation of natural law ethics. That progressed to: âThis is all great, but what are todayâs philosophers saying?â, to âwho is todayâs greatest living intellectual?â Noam Chomsky was calling the US a world empire at the time and was a chief critic of the Iraq War invasion. He was the only one stating the obvious [that I knew of]. Naturally, I started reading his works. I even wrote him a letter seeking advice, to which he responded. Whilst killing time youtubing Chomsky videos, someone had spammed âRon Paul: Americaâs Last Hopeâ below in the comments section.. Oh yeah? I had to check him out. Several days later this âpoliticianâ hadnât appeared to ever âback downâ or âsell outâ. Unbelievable. And that was it really, I was finally on the proper path.
It wasnât so much what Ron Paul was saying, but the principled stand he was making. The anti-imperialist stuff was a no-brainer. The âextremeâ free-market stuff came later as I still had to get out of 'the boxâ. Learning basic economics helped immensely. However, that did not start until after I had stalled for maybe 6 months parroting Ron Paulâs conclusions. Finally, after not being able to adequately defend a position of his, I had to either accept or deny the objection. I needed more information and endeavoured to find out why Ron 'believesâ what he does. Austrian Economics, and Libertarianism it was. From there the immersion began into a whole new way of thinking, or â an actual â way of thinking. I then commenced with all the beginner/intro books: Bastiatâs - The Law, Enemy of the State - Albert Jay Nock, Economics in One Lesson - Henry Hazlitt etc. The results of a few book buying binges can be viewed here. Next it was downloading and listening to the entire mises.org media centre over many months.
Reading âWhat Has Government Done to Our Money?â was an early eye opener. Rothbardâs clarity and reasoning took me in. However, it was a long while before I progressed enough to feel I could adequately defend the concept of a private law, or a voluntarist society. That being said there is always room for improvement. The general joke goes, âwhatâs the difference between a minarchist and an anarcho-capitalist?â With the punchline being a certain time frame, for example âabout 12 monthsâ. It all depends on the individual, and how intense their interest. For me it was probably about 9 months of considered thought. I was sold on the rights based arguments, however the glaring question remained âbut would it work?â. The journal article âDo We Ever Really Escape From [Voluntarism]?â removed all doubt.